Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Binge Drink

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

49.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 49.0 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 49.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 1.2%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (1.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (1.3%).
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Cancer

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Cancer: Medicare Population

7.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,119 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (7.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

80.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 80.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 80.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Colon Cancer Screening

63.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 63.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 63.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

69.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 69.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

9.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.2%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (9.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

67.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 67.5% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 67.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

13.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (13.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Diabetes

13.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

28.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (28.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3).
Prior Value
(27.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Diabetes: Medicare Population

28.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.9% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (27.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (28.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

86.9%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 86.9% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,088 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (85.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 86.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (86.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (86.0%).
Prior Value
(86.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

27.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 27.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children with a Disability

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children with a Disability

5.8%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.3%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Disability

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.1%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 4.7%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Vision Difficulty

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.0%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

76.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

90.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (90.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (89.8%).
Prior Value
(89.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with HMO Health Insurance

10.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 10.0%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (10.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

12.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.4%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (12.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

22.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.8%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (22.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (26.5%).
Prior Value
(26.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Military Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Military Health Insurance

5.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (5.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Other Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Other Health Insurance

6.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (6.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with POS Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with POS Health Insurance

1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 1.4%.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with PPO Health Insurance

29.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 29.9%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (29.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (29.7%).
Prior Value
(29.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults without Health Insurance

8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children with Health Insurance

94.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 94.5% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (94.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (94.1%).
Prior Value
(94.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

14.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 14.4%.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (14.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

30.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 30.4%.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (30.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility

Current Value:
24.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (25.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.1%.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (24.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (8.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.3%).
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Primary Care Provider Rate

43
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 43 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (43) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43).
Prior Value
(43)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

Current Value:
28.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.7%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (28.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with a Smartphone

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with a Smartphone

82.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 82.2% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (84.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 82.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (82.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.3%).
Prior Value
(78.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with an Internet Subscription

84.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 84.2% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 84.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

90.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Internet Subscription

88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 88.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol

19.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 19.8%.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (19.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.8%).
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure

30.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 30.3%.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (30.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Experienced a Stroke

3.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

81.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 81.4% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 81.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

14.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 14.7%.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (14.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

45.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 45.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 45.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (45.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.8).
Prior Value
(44.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

133.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 133.2 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 133.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (133.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (141.1).
Prior Value
(141.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

8.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Cholesterol Test History

83.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 83.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 83.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Heart Failure: Medicare Population

19.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 19.1% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,136 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 19.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (19.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.4%).
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area High Blood Pressure Prevalence

39.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 39.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

38.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 38.0% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 38.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

49.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 49.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 45.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (47.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 49.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(47.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (49.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Hypertension: Medicare Population

61.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 61.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 58.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (57.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 61.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (61.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (61.2%).
Prior Value
(61.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

31.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 31.4% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 31.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (31.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.2%).
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Stroke: Medicare Population

3.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,037 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (3.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

16.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (16.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.8).
Prior Value
(17.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

15.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 15.9%.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (15.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9%).
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

24.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

17.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (17.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.1).
Prior Value
(17.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Depression: Medicare Population

22.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.1% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,135 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (18.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (22.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.8%).
Prior Value
(20.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

7.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (7.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mental Health Provider Rate

178
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 178 which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (178) is greater and better than the previously measured value (171).
Prior Value
(171)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days

46.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 46.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

76.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (78.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 76.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (76.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.2%).
Prior Value
(68.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
38.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 38.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (40.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 38.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (38.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.2%).
Prior Value
(38.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

35.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 35.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 35.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

42.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 42.3% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 42.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Disability

35.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 35.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 15.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.7%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.5%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

39.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 39.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 39.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (39.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.4).
Prior Value
(40.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

10.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,124 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (10.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

14.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Visited a Dentist

59.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 59.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 59.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Dentist Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Dentist Rate

44
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 44 which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (44) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44).
Prior Value
(44)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

13.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.5%.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (13.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Arthritis

32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Kidney Disease

3.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

16.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.8), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (16.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7).
Prior Value
(16.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

27.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 27.3% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (24.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 27.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (27.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.2%).
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

6.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 6.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,086 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

34.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 34.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (33.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 34.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (34.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who are Sedentary

29.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

10.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 10.1%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (10.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

62.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 62.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (62.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.3%).
Prior Value
(47.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

9.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.8), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (9.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

90.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.4 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (90.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.7).
Prior Value
(96.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings

50.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 50.3 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,306 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 50.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (50.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.6).
Prior Value
(55.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma

6.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 6.7%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (6.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with COPD

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with COPD

9.9%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.9% which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Current Asthma

10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

Current Value:
56.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 56.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (38.1), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 56.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (56.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.0).
Prior Value
(58.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Asthma: Medicare Population

4.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 4.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,045 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (5.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (4.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area COPD: Medicare Population

13.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (13.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Chlamydia Incidence Rate

269.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 269.3 which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 294.9 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 467.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (495.0), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 269.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (269.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (263.3).
Prior Value
(263.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

95.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 95.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 74.5 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 148.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,826 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (179.1), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 95.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(179.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (95.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (71.2).
Prior Value
(71.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area HIV Prevalence Rate

65.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (382.2), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 65.0.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (65.0) is less  than the previously measured value (73.8).
Prior Value
(73.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 1.5%.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (1.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Smoke

20.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 20.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

5.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

2.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.9% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (1.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (2.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Happy with Weight

45.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 45.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Are Obese

38.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 38.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

64.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (64.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (69.9%).
Prior Value
(69.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

36.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 36.2%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (36.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (38.2%).
Prior Value
(38.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Insufficient Sleep

34.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 34.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 34.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 19.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Women's Health

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Women's Health

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

13.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.2%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (13.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

18.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 18.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 18.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (18.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

17.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.8%).
Prior Value
(16.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children in Single-Parent Households

22.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Linguistic Isolation

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 65+ Living Alone

29.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 29.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Social Associations

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Social Associations

11.8
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 11.8 which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 11.8 which is higher and better.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (11.8) is less and worse than the previously measured value (12.7).
Prior Value
(12.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households without a Vehicle

5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mean Travel Time to Work

24.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

33.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 33.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 33.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (33.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 0.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Drive Alone to Work

81.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 81.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 81.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Walk to Work

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 55.8% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 55.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 57.5% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Size of Labor Force

131,607
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (131,607) is less and worse than the previously measured value (132,905).
Prior Value
(132,905)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

4.0%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 4.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (4.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Child Food Insecurity Rate

12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.8%.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Food Insecurity Rate

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (11.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households Receiving SNAP with Children

47.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 47.4%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

41.6%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 41.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 41.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (41.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.7%).
Prior Value
(32.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Homeownership

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Homeownership

66.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 66.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 66.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

41.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 41.0% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 41.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Severe Housing Problems

13.1%
(2010-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (18.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (13.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Per Capita Income

$31,273
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of $31,273 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of $31,273 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens

37.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 37.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (37.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops

Current Value:
1.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.2%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (1.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with a 401k Plan

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with a 401k Plan

35.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 35.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (35.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with a Savings Account

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with a Savings Account

69.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 69.3% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (71.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (69.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.0%).
Prior Value
(68.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with Student Loan Debt

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Households with Student Loan Debt

7.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (7.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children Living Below Poverty Level

17.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.4% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.