Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

28.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 28.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (28.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3).
Prior Value
(27.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children with a Disability

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children with a Disability

5.8%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.3%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Disability

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.1%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 4.7%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with a Vision Difficulty

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.0%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

90.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (90.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (89.8%).
Prior Value
(89.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Persons with an Internet Subscription

88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 88.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

45.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 45.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 45.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (45.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.8).
Prior Value
(44.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

133.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 133.2 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 133.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (133.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (141.1).
Prior Value
(141.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

16.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (16.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.8).
Prior Value
(17.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

17.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (17.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.1).
Prior Value
(17.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Disability

35.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 35.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 15.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.7%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 7.5%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

39.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 39.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 39.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (39.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.4).
Prior Value
(40.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

16.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.8), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 16.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (16.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7).
Prior Value
(16.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

9.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.8), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (9.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

90.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.4 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 90.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (90.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.7).
Prior Value
(96.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings

50.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 50.3 which is in the worst 25% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,306 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 50.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (50.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.6).
Prior Value
(55.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

Current Value:
56.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 56.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (38.1), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 56.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (56.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.0).
Prior Value
(58.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

18.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 18.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 18.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (18.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Mean Travel Time to Work

24.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 0.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Drive Alone to Work

81.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 81.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 81.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Workers who Walk to Work

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 2.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

41.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 41.0% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 41.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Per Capita Income

$31,273
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of $31,273 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of $31,273 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Children Living Below Poverty Level

17.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.4% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Families Living Below Poverty Level

9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People Living Below Poverty Level

12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

21.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 21.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

17.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 17.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:

Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 89.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV