Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Maternal, Infant and Children's Health

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Children in Single-Parent Households

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

Children in Single-Parent Households

Value
Compared to:

Children in Single-Parent Households Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

22.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 22.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 9.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.