Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Weight

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Child Food Insecurity Rate Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Current Value:

Child Food Insecurity Rate Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 12.8%.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity Rate Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Current Value:
11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reid Health's Service Area (11.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

58.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 58.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.4% while service areas in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,128 U.S. counties and county equivalents.