Search for Indicators
Demographics Dashboard
The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Age and Sex
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Laurel, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Laurel, IN
14.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Lewisville, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Lewisville, IN
10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Liberty, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Liberty, IN
22.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(20.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Losantville, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Losantville, IN
12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Lynn, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Lynn, IN
20.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Metamora, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Metamora, IN
34.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Middletown, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Middletown, IN
21.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Milton, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Milton, IN
12.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Modoc, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Modoc, IN
10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mooreland, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mooreland, IN
10.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
29.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Castle, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Castle, IN
16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Madison, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Madison, OH
19.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Paris, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Paris, OH
20.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Trenton, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Trenton, IN
48.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Weston, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: New Weston, OH
28.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: North Star, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: North Star, OH
17.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
31.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Osgood, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Osgood, OH
14.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Palestine, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Palestine, OH
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Parker City, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Parker City, IN
22.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
16.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Richmond, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Richmond, IN
18.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
21.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Rossburg, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Rossburg, OH
24.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Saratoga, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Saratoga, IN
12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Shirley, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Shirley, IN
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Spiceland, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Spiceland, IN
8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
30.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Springport, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Springport, IN
38.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Straughn, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Straughn, IN
12.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
21.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Union City, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Union City, IN
19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Union City, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Union City, OH
17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Verona, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Verona, OH
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Versailles, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Versailles, OH
20.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
25.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West College Corner, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West College Corner, IN
20.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(20.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West Elkton, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West Elkton, OH
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West Manchester, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: West Manchester, OH
17.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Whitewater, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Whitewater, IN
24.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Winchester, IN
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Winchester, IN
20.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
Population Over Age 65 Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Darke, OH
Female Population County: Darke, OH
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Fayette, IN
Female Population County: Fayette, IN
50.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Franklin, IN
Female Population County: Franklin, IN
49.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Henry, IN
Female Population County: Henry, IN
47.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Preble, OH
Female Population County: Preble, OH
49.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Randolph, IN
Female Population County: Randolph, IN
49.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Union, IN
Female Population County: Union, IN
50.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population County: Wayne, IN
Female Population County: Wayne, IN
51.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Albany, IN
Female Population Census Place: Albany, IN
56.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Ansonia, OH
Female Population Census Place: Ansonia, OH
52.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Arcanum, OH
Female Population Census Place: Arcanum, OH
52.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Batesville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Batesville, IN
50.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Blountsville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Blountsville, IN
46.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Boston, IN
Female Population Census Place: Boston, IN
65.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Bradford, OH
Female Population Census Place: Bradford, OH
47.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Brookville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Brookville, IN
51.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
Female Population Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
43.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Cadiz, IN
Female Population Census Place: Cadiz, IN
43.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
Female Population Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
52.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Camden, OH
Female Population Census Place: Camden, OH
44.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Castine, OH
Female Population Census Place: Castine, OH
55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
Female Population Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
48.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Centerville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Centerville, IN
49.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: College Corner, OH
Female Population Census Place: College Corner, OH
61.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Connersville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Connersville, IN
52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Fayette, IN County Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Dublin, IN
Female Population Census Place: Dublin, IN
46.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Dunreith, IN
Female Population Census Place: Dunreith, IN
52.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: East Germantown, IN
Female Population Census Place: East Germantown, IN
48.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Eaton, OH
Female Population Census Place: Eaton, OH
54.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Economy, IN
Female Population Census Place: Economy, IN
48.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Eldorado, OH
Female Population Census Place: Eldorado, OH
50.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Farmland, IN
Female Population Census Place: Farmland, IN
53.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Fountain City, IN
Female Population Census Place: Fountain City, IN
51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
Female Population Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Glenwood, IN
Female Population Census Place: Glenwood, IN
47.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Fayette, IN County Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Gordon, OH
Female Population Census Place: Gordon, OH
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Gratis, OH
Female Population Census Place: Gratis, OH
45.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
Female Population Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Greensboro, IN
Female Population Census Place: Greensboro, IN
46.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Greenville, OH
Female Population Census Place: Greenville, OH
53.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Hagerstown, IN
Female Population Census Place: Hagerstown, IN
48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Hollansburg, OH
Female Population Census Place: Hollansburg, OH
50.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Ithaca, OH
Female Population Census Place: Ithaca, OH
37.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Kennard, IN
Female Population Census Place: Kennard, IN
52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Knightstown, IN
Female Population Census Place: Knightstown, IN
46.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Lake Lakengren, OH
Female Population Census Place: Lake Lakengren, OH
46.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Lake Santee, IN
Female Population Census Place: Lake Santee, IN
47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Laurel, IN
Female Population Census Place: Laurel, IN
61.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
Female Population Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
50.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Lewisville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Lewisville, IN
50.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Liberty, IN
Female Population Census Place: Liberty, IN
51.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(50.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Losantville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Losantville, IN
60.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Lynn, IN
Female Population Census Place: Lynn, IN
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Metamora, IN
Female Population Census Place: Metamora, IN
53.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Middletown, IN
Female Population Census Place: Middletown, IN
51.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Milton, IN
Female Population Census Place: Milton, IN
56.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Modoc, IN
Female Population Census Place: Modoc, IN
43.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Mooreland, IN
Female Population Census Place: Mooreland, IN
59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
Female Population Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
49.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
Female Population Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
54.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
Female Population Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
52.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: New Castle, IN
Female Population Census Place: New Castle, IN
48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: New Madison, OH
Female Population Census Place: New Madison, OH
51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: New Paris, OH
Female Population Census Place: New Paris, OH
49.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: New Trenton, IN
Female Population Census Place: New Trenton, IN
59.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: New Weston, OH
Female Population Census Place: New Weston, OH
52.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: North Star, OH
Female Population Census Place: North Star, OH
48.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
Female Population Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
62.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Osgood, OH
Female Population Census Place: Osgood, OH
42.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Palestine, OH
Female Population Census Place: Palestine, OH
58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Parker City, IN
Female Population Census Place: Parker City, IN
54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
Female Population Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
47.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Richmond, IN
Female Population Census Place: Richmond, IN
52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
Female Population Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
48.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Rossburg, OH
Female Population Census Place: Rossburg, OH
59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Saratoga, IN
Female Population Census Place: Saratoga, IN
48.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Shirley, IN
Female Population Census Place: Shirley, IN
49.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Spiceland, IN
Female Population Census Place: Spiceland, IN
50.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
Female Population Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
62.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Springport, IN
Female Population Census Place: Springport, IN
56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Straughn, IN
Female Population Census Place: Straughn, IN
48.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
Female Population Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Union City, IN
Female Population Census Place: Union City, IN
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Union City, OH
Female Population Census Place: Union City, OH
49.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Verona, OH
Female Population Census Place: Verona, OH
41.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Versailles, OH
Female Population Census Place: Versailles, OH
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
Female Population Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
49.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
Female Population Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
51.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West College Corner, IN
Female Population Census Place: West College Corner, IN
58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(50.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West Elkton, OH
Female Population Census Place: West Elkton, OH
40.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West Manchester, OH
Female Population Census Place: West Manchester, OH
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Whitewater, IN
Female Population Census Place: Whitewater, IN
33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Winchester, IN
Female Population Census Place: Winchester, IN
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
Female Population Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
41.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Darke, OH
Male Population County: Darke, OH
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Fayette, IN
Male Population County: Fayette, IN
49.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Franklin, IN
Male Population County: Franklin, IN
50.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Henry, IN
Male Population County: Henry, IN
52.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Preble, OH
Male Population County: Preble, OH
50.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Randolph, IN
Male Population County: Randolph, IN
50.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Union, IN
Male Population County: Union, IN
49.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Wayne, IN
Male Population County: Wayne, IN
48.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Albany, IN
Male Population Census Place: Albany, IN
43.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
